Fall grain storage

On farm grain storage essential to most producers

Reports from earlier this summer suggest that Western Canadian producers are on pace to have larger than average grain carry over into the 2018-2019 crop year. Ryan Furtas, input market analyst with Alberta Agriculture and Forestry, breaks down the findings from this year’s Grain Storage: Considerations (https://www1.agric.gov.ab.ca/$department/deptdocs.nsf/all/sis15194) report and what producers should consider when looking for more grain storage.

“On farm grain storage is essential for most Alberta cropping operations and has become a higher priority in past ten years due to record crop yields and higher commodity values,” says Furtas. “Keeping grain and oilseed in good condition allows producers to employ marketing strategies that serves them best, such as storing over the short term to avoid seasonal pricing. According to Statistics Canada, over the past three years Alberta farmers have constructed an additional one million bushels of permanent grain storage, which demonstrates the importance of growing on farm storage capacity.”

Producers need to consider their entire operation when deciding to invest in grain storage, including the size of the operation, distance the land is from the storage area, age of the operator, and whether the land is rented or owned. “Permanent storage provides piece of mind that grain is protected from weather and wildlife damage,” notes Furtas. “It includes steel grain bins, sheds, and some instances of old elevators. Temporary systems are excellent for short term storage and primarily include grain bags, grain rings, bunkers, or open piles. The most commonly used systems in Alberta are grain bins and grain baggers. When comparing bins to bags, grain bins are more economical when storing smaller volumes of grain.”

Pricing of grain bags becomes more competitive when storing larger volumes of product on an annual basis. Explains Furtas, “Based on the pricing used in the report and assuming the producer has no storage bias, 70,000 bushels was needed to be stored per year before bags were more economical than bins. Factors such as lifespan, the cost of the system, depreciation, salvage value, repairs and maintenance, interest, and spoilage need to be calculated to make a fair comparison of each system.”

The report features a price comparison based on requiring an additional 25,000 bushels of storage. The analysis includes several economics factors such as depreciation, salvage value, interest on investment, maintenance, and set up costs.

“The example shows that grain rings are the most economical solution for grain storage, coming in at $0.10 per bushel,” says Furtas. “However, it is likely the least desirable system as it represents an increased work load for the farm, and a higher risk for grain loss.”

Grain bins are the second most economical option coming in at $0.24 to $0.27 per bushel. The smooth walled hopper on concrete represents the more expensive end of the price range, compared to a corrugated steel on a flat bottom or corrugated steel on hoppers. Explains Furtas, “The higher cost is due to a large initial investment and extra interest, but it also represents the least amount of risk of grain loss or spoilage and possess high salvage value.”

The grain bagging system is the highest cost for adding 25,000 bushels of storage, coming in at $0.58 per bushel. “This is due to the high investment cost for the bagger and extractor along with a higher depreciation rate resulting in lower salvage values. Since grain bagging systems have unlimited storage capacity, the cost per bushel over the lifespan of the asset decreases the more bushels being stored. As mentioned earlier, grain bagging systems become competitive with bins at the 70,000 bushel mark,” explains Furtas.

“Grain storage considerations are expensive decisions for farms to make,” adds Furtas. “Deciding on which storage option to select can be complicated and dependent on the needs of the individual operation. The aim of the report is to help with planning and research to select the right storage option for the farm business operation.”

-Submitted by Alberta Agriculture

Get local stories you won't find anywhere else right to your inbox.
Sign up here

Just Posted

New intersection coming for Hwy. #2A near grain terminal

G3 Canada will begin new intersection in 2020

Franchises a great option for business-minded

BMO expert gives brief look at 2020

County of Wetaskiwin transfer donated land to Scouts Canada body

A.L. Siler originally asked county to hold land in trust in 1972

Good Neighbour award presented at Lakedell Ag Society AGM

Meryln Fontaine Memorial presented to Tammy Southern

Wetaskiwin RCMP seeking witnesses to car-jacking

Armed theft resulted in two subjects facing multiple charges

Blair says RCMP have met Wet’suwet’en conditions, so barricades should come down

The Wet’suwet’en’s hereditary chiefs oppose the Coastal GasLink project

Federal minister pledges to meet Wet’suwet’en chiefs in B.C. over natural gas pipeline

The Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs say they are visiting Mohawk territory

Pipeline dispute: Tories put no-confidence motion on House of Commons agenda

Conservatives say they have no confidence in the Trudeau government to end the rail blockades

Blockade on CN rail line in Edmonton removed, injunction granted

The blockade consisted of wooden pallets on the tracks and signs that say ‘No Consent’

Canadians aboard coronavirus-ridden cruise ship to return home tonight

Among the infected are 47 Canadians who will have to remain in Japan for treatment

Carbon risk for Alberta’s public pension manager questioned

AIMCo says nearly $115 billion invested in carbon-intensive industries is on par with other funds

Worker, shocked at future Amazon warehouse in Nisku, has died: family

Colton Quast, 25, was taken to hospital and put in a medically induced coma

Blockade supporting Wet’suwet’en hereditary chiefs on rail line in Edmonton

‘Cuzzins for Wet’suwet’en’ post pics of wooden crates on line, signs saying ‘No Pipelines on Stolen Land’

Higher costs should kill Trans Mountain pipeline, federal opposition says

Most recent total was $12.6 billion, much higher than a previous $7.4-billion estimate

Most Read