Wetaskiwin property owner says court clean-up order was not proper

City of Wetaskiwin agrees to extend clean-up period for Norwood Developments debris

The area in question is posted as no dumping.

Anyone who says you can’t fight city hall obviously wasn’t at the regular meeting of Wetaskiwin city council Jan.9.

John Goofers, owner of Norwood Developments, appeared before council in their chambers to appeal a property clean-up order he was issued by mail dated Nov. 23.

The order, issued by the city’s protective services department, involved property located at 3602 49th Street, Plan 7821171, Bl 53, Lot 12 owned by Norwood Developments. The order stated, “As a result of the inspection of the property that occurred on Oct. 6, 2016 by the Engineering Services in regards to the demolition pit located on the property…You are therefore ordered to…remove the portion of the demolition pile that is currently located approximately 8.8 meters onto the city roadway and roadway allowance. You must comply with this order on or before Dec. 14, 2016.”

The letter finished by stating Section 566(1) of the Municipal Government Act gives the city the authority to fine a non-compliant recipient up to $10,000 or a jail term up to a year, or both.

Goofers wanted to appeal the order, and also felt he hadn’t be treated fairly or properly. “I find the period of time very short to deal with this order,” said Goofers to council. He said 20 days was not long enough in a very cold winter to remove the material. Also, he pointed out that, yes, some of the material had come from his property, but some of it was refuse and garbage dumped by unknown people despite the fact the city has a “no dumping” sign right there.

He also questioned why the order was sent in the first place, rather than a city staff member just calling him and talking about the problem. “And I’d like to know why you guys are so heavy-handed all the time,” said Goofers. Goofers said it seems like when a member of the business community applies for something, it takes long periods of time to get a response but he gets an order that includes details about imprisonment.

“You threatened us with imprisonment,” said Goofers. “Where does the city get the authority to imprison people?”

Councilor Wayne Neilson asked Goofers, “How long has that pile been there that you can recollect?” Goofers responded about 12 years.

Councilor June Boyda asked Goofers why 20 days was not long enough. Goofers responded, “It’s just that it’s frozen now.” He said he doesn’t have a problem working with the city, but he runs a business and has a lot to do, often working out of town. He said it’s difficult to just drop everything for this order.

Councilor Patricia MacQuarrie asked if Goofers was willing to clean up everything in the cul-de-sac, not just his debris. There was confusion throughout the evening on this point, as early on Goofers stated Norwood Developments would clean up and crush “anything not on our property,” but later in the meeting Goofers said, “I will not be moving the garbage.” Several times during the meeting the garbage was described as old furniture, propane tanks and other material.

Director of protective services Leigh Sawicki along with peace officers Eric Christiansen and Trent Jager were all at the meeting. Sawicki stated the order was a standard letter that is used in those situations. After some questions from council, Sawicki stated there was a complaint from the city public works department that the cul-de-sac couldn’t be cleaned, so the order was issued.

Councilor Neilson asked why a staff member didn’t phone Goofers to which Sawicki answered several times that staff followed the policy and procedures in place for situations like this, which are actually similar to those in place in other municipalities. He stated that personally contacting people as Neilson suggested isn’t practical when it comes to the time needed.

It was noted the letter Goofers received didn’t have a “contact us if you have concerns” portion, but did have information about appealing the decision.

Councilor Neilson noted there is a big difference between a phone call and a letter threatening imprisonment. “I’m not so sure the person receiving the notice would agree if it’s the same,” he said. “To me, business friendly means having a conversation.”

Councilor Tyler Gandam asked if an order is issued every time a nuisance property pops up. Officers answered that they always issue a letter, though it may not be exactly the same as the one Goofers received. Gandam asked if the consequences of not following the order are always the same, to which officers answered yes.

Councilor Bert Horvey began discussing extending the order time to give Goofers a chance to clean the debris after spring thaw. Neilson said spring was too soon. Councilor Joe Branco noted spring has been known to show up late. Goofers said he’d prefer to pick his own date.

Gandam suggested sending city staff to help clean up the area, as some of the debris wasn’t Goofers.’ Councilor June Boyda opined that it’s possible more garbage was dumped there because other people saw Goofers’ debris there.

Gandam pointed out it was dumped on city property, not Goofers’.

Eventually, councilor voted 5-2 in favour of extending the time period to July 31 for Norwood developments to clean up debris located in the cul-de-sac in question.

 

Just Posted

Edmonton International Raceway awards held Nov. 2

EIR awards night theme was “Here Comes the Rain Again, Dress Appropriately!”

Winter Warm Up in Wetaskiwin Nov. 21 to 24

Parade, photos with Santa and so much more in Wetaskiwin

Popular Christmas Checkstop drive returns to Wetaskiwin

2019 Wetaskiwin Charity Checkstop Dec. 7

Wetaskiwin council commits $65k to homeless shelter

Wetaskiwin City Council Allocates Funds to Open Emergency Shelter

Provincial Budget Negatively Impacts WRPS: board chair

WRPS faces over $3 million loss on original budget

Teen with cancer whose viral video urged Canadians to vote has died, uncle tweets

Maddison Yetman had been looking forward to voting in her first federal election since junior high school

Protesters say Alberta bill would make it harder to access some medical services

The bill would mean a health-care provider could not be sanctioned for refusing to provide a service due to morals

MacLean says “Coach’s Corner is no more” following Cherry’s dismissal from Hockey Night

Cherry had singled out new immigrants in for not honouring Canada’s veterans and fallen soldiers

Rebels ride 3-goal first period to 4-3 win over Brandon

Goaltender Byron Fancy with key saves in third period to save game

Supreme Court of Canada dismisses murder appeals in 2013 Calgary swarming death

Assmar Shlah and Franz Cabrera were convicted in 2016 of second-degree murder

One year on, most oil-and-gas bailout money has moved, federal government says

Sweden’s central bank says it has sold its Alberta-government issued bonds

Ski resorts selling mountain water is a risky move, critics say

Alberta allowed ski resort in Kananaskis Country to sell about 50 million litres to third party

Sportsnet looks at new options for Coach’s Corner time slot, post-Don Cherry

Spokesperson says Hall of Fame feature on tap this weekend after co-host’s firing

Most Read